"In the market for a Pentax K-1000? Do you actually want to use it as a film camera, and do you have no sentimental attachment that makes you specifically want this model? Do you actually like saving money? Would you like a camera with nearly identical capabilities to a K-1000 at a fraction of the price? If so, I present your camera!"
I rarely editorialize in my posts. I tend to simply lay out my personal observations specific to particular camera model or film, present these observations along with my results, and let you, the reader, make an informed choice from the information I present. I don't typically get into the heartfelt and often irrational positions that Camera A is "better" than Camera B so you'd better not buy the latter.
But every now and again, I notice something really off about the film world at large to which I feel I need to add a sanity check, and this is very much one of them.
One of the most iconic of 35mm film cameras of the later decades of film's prominence was the Pentax K-1000, a fairly simple 35mm SLR camera offering metered manual shooting and little else in the way of bells and whistles. For years, it was THE standard camera for photography students and school yearbook offices, largely because it was the cheapest manual control camera available at the time. It is a ubiquitous piece of film history as classic as a Hershey Chocolate Bar. And it's also quite overpriced in today's market.






